Connect with us

Centenunlimited News

Centenunlimited News

Supreme Court to hear Obamacare birth control case


Uncategorized

Supreme Court to hear Obamacare birth control case

The Supreme Court will weigh in on contraceptive coverage under the nation’s health care law this term, agreeing to hear a case involving the Obamacare rule requiring large companies to help pay for their employees’ birth control. The high court will review whether the Trump administration was on solid ground when it gave religious employers…

Supreme Court to hear Obamacare birth control case

The Supreme Court will weigh in on contraceptive coverage under the nation's health care law this term, agreeing to hear a case involving the Obamacare rule requiring large companies to help pay for their employees' birth control. The high court will review whether the Trump administration was on solid ground when it gave religious employers and universities broader religious and moral exemptions to the Obamacare contraception mandate, which requires health care plans to offer free birth control.

This is another case involving the Little Sisters of the Poor, an order of Roman Catholic nuns that objected to the birth control mandate and prevailed in its request from the Supreme Court for a religious exemption in 2016. 

Now the court will consider allowing the Trump administration to enforce rules that allow more employers to deny insurance coverage for contraceptives to women. 

The case is likely to be heard in April. The Supreme Court will review an appeals court ruling that blocked the Trump administration rules because it did not follow proper procedures. The new policy on contraception, issued by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), would allow more categories of employers, including publicly traded companies, to opt out of providing no-cost birth control to women by claiming religious objections.

The policy also would allow some employers, though not publicly traded companies, to raise moral objections to covering contraceptives.

Employers also would be able to cover some birth control methods, and not others. Some employers have objected to covering modern, long-acting implantable contraceptives, such as IUDs, which are more expensive and considered highly effective in preventing pregnancies.

Free Traffic Real Traffic At Your Finger Tips

Get Traffic With Zero Money Down

Join with bonus

Even though the Trump rules remain blocked, a ruling by a federal judge in Texas in June already allows most people who object to covering contraception to avoid doing so.

The issue in all the cases is the method originally adopted by the Obama administration to allow religiously affiliated organizations to opt out of paying for contraception while making sure that women under their plans would not be left with the bill.

Some groups complained that the opt-out process violated their religious beliefs and wanted to be relieved of even signaling their religious objection.

The percentage of female employees paying their own money for birth control pills has plunged to under 4%, from 21%, since contraception became a covered preventive health benefit under the Obama-era health law, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation.

Jan Crawford contributed to this report.

Subscribe to Centenunlimited news

We hate SPAM and promise to keep your email address safe

Top Stories

To Top